Tuesday, December 22, 2015
A Different Christmas
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Football and Life: Triumphs Don't Always Have Trophies
Monday, August 31, 2015
Death by Television
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Football and Life
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Dad.
Monday, March 9, 2015
Prostrates and Prostates
He knew he was a defeated man, succumbing to the power that he loved, and now had him sitting in my office waiting for the self-imposed doom that had weighed on his mind for over a decade.
The power that he loved, his wife, sat next to him. Just making sure EVERYTHING was done for him. “Yes, he’s here for a physical. A FULL physical. I want him checked out completely,” she said.
Not just any physical. He had just turned 50. It was that physical. The one every man flinches, and then puckers a little, when he thinks about it.
In her mind his prostate had a date. She was there to see it through. She had dutifully had PAP smears and pelvic exams over the past thirty years as a routine, birthed their babies buck naked and displayed to the world in the birthing room, and, by golly, it was now his turn.
And he knew it, too. He had learned, as most wise husbands do, that he wasn’t going to win by posturing, avoidance or denial. So he summoned the wise courage to have no stupid courage, and agreed to her request.
She had her list of his problems for me to address, offered him one more look, and left us to go back to her work. He just wanted out. Little did he know she wasn’t up to date. The Task Force had changed their recommendations.
Per their website, “U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF or Task Force) is an independent group of national experts in prevention and evidence-based medicine that works to improve the health of all Americans by making evidence-based recommendations about clinical preventive services such as screenings, counseling services, or preventive medications.”
This is the source of the majority of guidelines that primary care physicians will use to guide their choices and treatment plans for detecting, treating and preventing illness. This is the group that stated within the past year that the old standard of the prostate blood test (PSA) and yearly rectal exam was no longer recommended as a screening tool for asymptomatic or low risk men. At any age.
Therefore, if a man didn’t have a strong family history or any symptoms suggesting prostate issues, a rectal exam (finger test) and blood work (PSA) was not recommended.
I was reminded of this at my conference last week in Atlanta. (Incidentally, driving I-75 across I-275 in Atlanta provokes a certain level of adrenaline. Driving into Atlanta with heavy sleet, snow and ice is entire new level of peachy fear. Atlantans, remembering the snow-ice debacle on their roads from 2014, were exiting their city early in a manner probably not seen since Sherman. It was memorable.)
Not many of my fellow physicians agreed with this recommendation and likely will still continue offering both to their male patients. It is a challenge to explain the reasoning of the Task Force, especially when it is so personal.
The reasoning of the Task Force is similar to the old phrase that “more men die with prostate cancer than from prostate cancer.” This, of course, is only comforting if it is someone else’s prostate.
Statistically, the risk of cancer and the potential harm that can come from testing suspicious blood tests and exams were weighed by the committee. Their comments are as follows -
“The reduction in prostate cancer mortality 10 to 14 years after PSA-based screening is, at most, very small, even for men in the optimal age range of 55 to 69 years.” Translation: a few will die, but it’s only a few.
“The harms of screening include pain, fever, bleeding, infection, and transient urinary difficulties associated with prostate biopsy, psychological harm of false-positive test results, and overdiagnosis.” Translation: there are some short term complications in pursuing a cancer that may take your life.
“Harms of treatment include erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, bowel dysfunction, and a small risk for premature death.” Translation: some men would rather face prostate cancer than living with erectile dysfunction and urinary leakage. Well, yes, but I’ve seen untreated prostate cancer do the same thing when it spreads. And with a lot of excruciating bone pain, too.
“Because of the current inability to reliably distinguish tumors that will remain indolent from those destined to be lethal, many men are being subjected to the harms of treatment for prostate cancer that will never become symptomatic.” True, but what if it is symptomatic? What if it is yours?
I will explain these recommendations to my male patients and their wardens, sorry, wives, and then also offer the blood work and exam if they wish to have it. Thankfully, at least to this point, we as physicians still have some choice in how we manage the care of our patients. The day of the cookbook, impersonal, data-driven medical care is upon us and rapidly taking over. Some days I feel I am a modern day blacksmith looking at the first Model T Ford rolling into town.
The simple reason I will do this is based on the one thing, the very thing that is crucial here, that all of the data, documents, digital dividing and doctoral discussions on committees cannot measure - fear. The fear of the unknown. Is it there? Is it not? Is it possible?
My experience is that patients fear the unknown much more than they fear the known. Given a challenge with an abnormal result, I have seen the most anxious patients courage-up and want to know if it is good or bad. I cannot recall one patient telling me “I don’t want to know.”
My male patient? His fear of his wife overcame his fear of blood work and exam. He’s already preparing his researched defense for next year, though.
Eric J. Littleton, M.D. (@DrEricLittleton) is a Family Physician in Sevierville, TN. His office is in the UT Regional Health Center Sevierville at 1130 Middle Creek Road. Topics covered are general in nature and should not be used to change medical treatments and/or plans without first discussing with your physician. Send questions to askdrlittleton@gmail.com
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Glen's Treatment Dog
Research has uncovered a new treatment for patients with advanced cancer. It improves the social and emotional scores of patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation treatments even as their functional and physical scores plummeted.
Science may have just confirmed it, but I knew about this treatment when I was a boy.
Glen was my next door neighbor growing up. He was the same age as my two grandfathers and he and his wife had no children. I became an unofficial grandchild.
He had served in the Pacific in WWII. He was married thirteen years before the country asked him to leave Harriman for three years of service. He traveled from island to island, sending home cryptic letters to his wife asking about a certain cousin moving north to Oakdale or Coalfield. That's how she tracked him from island to island while he was gone.
He saw a lot of horror, hate and death in the Pacific. He enjoyed every day with a smile and a laugh.
He taught me checkers. He taught me quick humility at checkers on many Friday nights as we watched a Braves ballgame (they usually lost, too). He taught me how to toss horseshoes and bounce them in. He bought me a pair of Hee-Haw overalls when I was five (all of those photos are in my possession).
And he taught me how to love dogs. More importantly, he taught me how dogs can love.
A study released in January 2015 in the Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology reported a remarkable improvement in the social and emotional scores of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation treatment for head and neck cancer.
The lead researcher, Stewart Fleishman, MD, of Continuum Cancer Centers of New York Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City stated he was "amazed" at the effect on the group of patients studied.
This isn't new, it is just newly documented. Documented research gives footing to further research and funding for payment. Animals have been known to provide therapy for patients, but it hasn't been studied.
The 37 mostly male patients had an average of 18 visits over 7 weeks for treatment of radiation and chemotherapy. The course usually resulted in the patients having significant pain, skin lesions, difficulty swallowing and eating, and fatigue. Nevertheless, even as those life altering symptoms physically affected the patients, their measured emotional scores improved.
One patient even stated she would have given up but wanted to see the dog for the next visit.
The dogs were daily groomed and bathed, and special care given to cleansing their paws prior to each visit. No mention of the breed was noted. (I would guess labs, but I am completely biased).
Further research is already ongoing, especially for children with cancer. Dr. Fleishman also noted most cancer centers already have therapy dogs as part of their treatment across the country. Again, no one had measured its effects.
Glen loved all the dogs in our neighborhood. Every yard had a dog path that lead to his house for the distribution of snacks. You could set your clock by it. I remember waking up on summer mornings and hearing through the open window Glen playing his mandolin on his front steps as the dogs formed his audience.
Glen and his wife had a Truce Marriage. They were of a generation that rarely even said the word divorce, much less did it, and didn't believe in murder, either. Therefore, they had a truce. They had routines (6 ounce Coca-Cola split evenly at 11:30 each day) and quick verbal sparring along with the pleasant social appearances and diligent work on the house.
If they were busy on the house and yard, they didn't have time to argue. My dad told me "she is a Martin and they are a cold bunch" but I found that personally difficult to believe. A few of the Martins seemed to be rather pleasant.
Then Glen got cancer. His bone marrow, possibly from some radiation he was exposed to in WWII, decided to make unusual cells. Treatment was limited and brutal back then. He became too weak to leave the bed in the hospital. He just wanted to go home to die.
She said no. She didn't want to care for him. They had plenty of money to pay for the care, but she didn't want him there.
After sixty plus years of marriage, service in WWII, successful small business ownership, Glen ended up in a nursing home bed with his failing body and functioning mind. My mother had always been close to him and he asked her for one favor.
Bring a dog in to see him.
Special arrangements were made, the owner of the nursing home happened to be out of town, and Sophie, our white Eskimo Spitz, made her way into Johnson's Nursing Home. The effect was obvious. Glen didn't last long after that, but he died with the faith of a Christian man and the peace of a dog lover. He didn't say much about his wife.
Dog's, at least most dogs, teach unconditional love. They are happy to see us, quick to forgive and will quietly wait for sometimes even just a glance or a touch. A treat? Well, yes, of course. A bad day? Well, let's just be excited about seeing each other and it will all be better.
Dogs love their masters. (Cats work their staff.)
Unconditional love is a trait that Christians and churches are supposed to have. Love even when there are faults. Embrace even when there are bad days. Forgive and work to have a better relationship. Never reject or push out the door for faults, but work to find a way to love and serve even as we are weak and flawed. Dogs teach that. We all fail at it. Sometimes miserably.
Unconditional love can make unbearable conditions tolerable. Research now has documented it, but it was already known to anyone who has loved a dog.
It should be a part of our nature, but we fail at it. Maybe dogs are our quick reminders of traits we need to have and show each other, especially when the days are challenging.
His wife? She died alone in her own nursing home bed many years later after, according to my dad, "enjoying many years of poor health." She loved pills and not people. She enjoyed attention but struggled to give it. She had less than ten people stand around her casket and no funeral.
Whatever may have caused her coldness, she kept it to the bitter end.
I never saw her pet a dog, either.
Eric J. Littleton, M.D. (@DrEricLittleton) is a Family Physician in Sevierville, TN. His office is in the UT Regional Health Center Sevierville at 1130 Middle Creek Road. Topics covered are general in nature and should not be used to change medical treatments and/or plans without first discussing with your physician. Send questions to askdrlittleton@gmail.com

